Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
M. Nawaf
To Win
O. Pieczkowski
To Win
Mashari Nawaf vs Olaf Pieczkowski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nawaf vs Pieczkowski analysis and find out who is favored!
Upcoming Match
Nawaf VS Pieczkowski PREDICTION Hard
M15 Doha atp
- / First
ODDS
Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Mashari Nawaf takes on Olaf Pieczkowski in the ATP M15 Doha Men's Singles 2023 on . Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page.
Mashari Nawaf vs Olaf Pieczkowski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nawaf has won 36.71% of points on his second serve, while Pieczkowski has won 46.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nawaf, in recent form, has won 40% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pieczkowski has won 52.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25% and 33.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nawaf has saved 40.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pieczkowski has saved 60.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nawaf has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 6), with Pieczkowski winning 58.57% (W/L 41/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nawaf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11). Pieczkowski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 43/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Nawaf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 6), where as Pieczkowski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 36/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nawaf winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nawaf winning 0 and Pieczkowski winning 2. The last match between Nawaf and Pieczkowski was at the M15 Doha, 09-10-2023, First, Hard with Olaf Pieczkowski getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nawaf and Pieczkowski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nawaf winning 0 times and Pieczkowski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nawaf winning 0, and Pieczkowski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nawaf has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.33 while Pieczkowski has played against players with an average rank of 199.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nawaf has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pieczkowski has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nawaf has converted 18.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pieczkowski has converted 47.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nawaf 0 - 1 Pieczkowski
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
537
Rank
514
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
8% (1-11)
Career Total W/L
57% (72-55)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
50% (12-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nawaf VS Pieczkowski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mashari Nawaf | Olaf Pieczkowski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 2 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:0 | 1:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (37/66) | 51% (18/35) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 49% (18/37) | 94% (17/18) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (11/29) | 71% (12/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 17% (6/35) | 56% (37/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nawaf VS Pieczkowski H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats 
Mashari Nawaf
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
35
|
|||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Mashari Nawaf
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mashari Nawaf | Olaf Pieczkowski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 53% (28/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 11% (3/24) | 50% (250/246) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.08 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 82 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 342 | 244.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (47/86) | 60% (966/1602) |
| 1st Serve W% | 38% (18/47) | 67% (650/966) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 31% (12/39) | 48% (305/636) |
| BPs Won% Total | 25% (1/4) | 49% (75/154) |
| Return Pts W% | 32% (26/82) | 41% (649/1602) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Mashari Nawaf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Mashari Nawaf
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
Mashari Nawaf
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Mashari Nawaf
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan James Storrie
Player
Mashari Nawaf
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Mashari Nawaf
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Mashari Nawaf
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Mashari Nawaf
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Piotr Kusiewicz
Player
Mashari Nawaf
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Olaf Pieczkowski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
40
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Alexander Frusina
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Hamish Stewart
64%
(
77 of
121)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Martyn Pawelski
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Fabio Nestola
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nawaf Vs Pieczkowski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
